What are the most useless college administrator roles?

Hello, I'm doing a bit of research about the higher education system. Can anyone share their opinion on some administrative roles in college that they think are not so beneficial or necessary?

While it's certainly valid to scrutinize the administrative functions of a college or university, it's critical to remember that the efficacy of an administrative role can vary considerably from school to school. One university's "useless" role might be another's essential cog in the machine.

For example, some might point to Vice Presidents or Deans in charge of sustainability projects at universities where there's little active involvement or funding in such projects. Without the funds or the student body interest, some may argue these positions could be redundant.

Similarly, roles such as Chief Diversity Officers have come under scrutiny in recent years, where some students and faculty ask whether this role actually leads to meaningful change in diversity and inclusion, or if it simply exists for the school to show they're addressing the issue. Again, the effectiveness of these roles varies from one institution to the next.

There are also arguments made about roles oriented toward alumni relations and fundraising. While these roles can be crucial for maintaining the financial health of a college, critics sometimes argue that they contribute to the commercialization of education rather than focusing on student well-being and learning.

It's essential to be cautious about labeling any role as "useless" without a comprehensive understanding of the context in which it operates. The examples provided highlight areas where effectiveness has been questioned, but the quality and necessity of these roles can vary significantly based on the individuals in those positions and the university environment in which they operate.