What's the strategic benefit of applying Early Decision II vs Regular Decision?

If I'm not entirely sure about choosing a school, but still want a better chance of admission, should I consider ED II over RD? Also, what are the differences in chances or benefits between these options?

Applying Early Decision II (ED II) over Regular Decision (RD) can certainly provide some strategic and statistical advantages, but it also comes with important commitments that you should be aware of.

First, ED II typically provides a slightly higher acceptance rate than RD. This can be a strategic choice if you're admittedly partial to a school but not ready to commit at the time of ED I deadlines. Remember that the acceptance rates are not absolute guarantees, but they do indicate a relative advantage for ED II applicants.

Another advantage is that ED II can provide another opportunity for priority consideration. If you weren't admitted to your ED I school, ED II allows you another chance to demonstrate your firm commitment to a different school, which colleges appreciate.

Like ED I, you should only chose ED II if you're sure that this school is your top choice, and you're ready and willing to commit if admitted. ED II, like ED I, will require you to withdraw all other college applications if you're accepted.

But remember, Financial aid can be a certain consideration—since ED II, like ED I, is a binding decision, you should make sure the college is financially feasible based on the Net Price Calculator estimates. If admitted, you'll have very limited time to negotiate your financial aid package before needing to commit.

So, in essence, the main difference between ED II and RD is simply the binding nature of ED II and the potential advantages provided by that commitment (like higher chances of admission). As always, this choice should be made after careful consideration of your desires, academic profile, and financial situation.