Early Decision vs Regular Decision: Which is better?

I'm torn between applying early decision or regular decision. I want to increase my chances of getting in, but I'm not 100% on where I want to commit yet. How did others make this decision, and what are the pros and cons?

Deciding between Early Decision (ED) and Regular Decision (RD) is indeed a pivotal moment in your college application journey. Here's a quick rundown of each:

1. Early Decision: The main advantage of ED is that it can significantly boost your chances of acceptance. On average, applying ED can result in a 1.6x or a 60% increase in your chances of admission at super selective schools. Yet, ED comes with a binding commitment—if you are accepted, you must enroll, provided that the school’s financial aid offer is adequate. ED is ideal when you have a clear first-choice school and your financial situation allows for some level of uncertainty.

2. Regular Decision: RD, on the other hand, allows you the most time to finalize your application and gather all required materials. It also lets you send applications to various colleges at once and compare offers and financial aid packages before committing to a school. It's non-binding, so you have no obligation to attend if you're accepted.

Weighing the pros and cons, you should consider ED only if you have a clear top choice and you're comfortable with the financial prospects. Many students also feel that the extra time offered by RD allows them to present a stronger application. Keep in mind that your choice between ED and RD should consider not just possible advantages in terms of acceptance rates, but also which method best serves your academic profile and personal circumstances.