What are the main differences between Restrictive Early Action and Regular Decision? I'm trying to figure out which might be a better fit for my college applications.
The main differences between Restrictive Early Action (REA) and Regular Decision (RD) lie in their deadlines, the timing of their admissions decisions, and the commitment they require from you if accepted.
For REA, you generally submit your application by November 1st, and you'll hear back around mid-December. It's important to note that, while you're not obligated to attend if accepted, REA is 'restrictive' because you're often not allowed to apply to other universities' Early Action or Early Decision programs.
On the other hand, Regular Decision applications are typically due around January 1st, and you'll receive your decision by late March or early April. RD carries no restrictions on where else you can apply.
As to which one might be a better fit, it will largely be determined by your readiness and your interest level in a particular school. If you have a clear top-choice university and your application is ready by November, REA could be a good fit. It can occasionally boost acceptance chances (due to yield benefits), with the bonus of knowing your admission outcome early.
However, if you'd like more time to improve your applications, or you're equally interested in multiple schools and would like more time to decide, applying Regular Decision may be more advantageous. Plus, RD doesn't require you to navigate the restrictions that often accompany REA agreements.
Ultimately, please consider your own readiness, competitiveness, academic record up to now, and how much you're inclined toward a specific university before making a decision.
CollegeVine’s Q&A seeks to offer informed perspectives on commonly asked admissions questions. Every answer is refined and validated by our team of admissions experts to ensure it resonates with trusted knowledge in the field.