What do colleges like to see for extracurriculars?
Hi, sophomore here. I’m really confused about how colleges look at ECs. I do a lot of volunteering at the hospital, I’m in student council and I’m thinking about doing track in the spring but I’m not sure if it’s worth it. Obviously I want to do ECs based on whether I like them or not, but I also want to make sure I’m using my time productively. Like if I can do an EC I like but also help my college situation then that’s like literally better, right?
Anyway, I’m just confused as to how colleges think about ECs. Thanks and sorry if this was a bit rambly!
To write your own answer, please log in or sign up (it’s free!)
How does karma work?
The system is simple: you receive karma (sort of like a credit) when you help others. If you're short on karma, you can do any of the following to earn more:
- 1 karma for each 👍 upvote on a question you post
- 1 karma for each 👍 upvote on an answer you post
if your answer is marked accepted
- 10 karma for reviewing an essay
- 10 karma if your essay review is rated 5 ⭐️
You can then use your karma to submit an essay for review or guarantee an expert answer on Q&A.
No worries, IMO your question wasn’t rambly at all! :)
Colleges care about ECs when they have too many applicants who are qualified academically. Imagine being an admissions officer and thousands of applications with really good SAT/ACT and GPAs… but you can only accept a few hundred. How would you choose between them?
Realistically, the answer is that you’d want to look at factors outside of academics. This is why the more competitive a college is, the more likely they are to really care about qualitative factors like ECs, essays, rec letters, etc.
Now imagine trying to evaluate the ECs of thousands of applicants with strong academics -- how would you go about doing that? Well, you definitely would come up with some sort of criteria, right?
The criteria looks something like this:
1. How impressive is the activity? Usually they’ll look at what you’ve achieved, whether that’s through awards won or leadership. More awards + more leadership = better.
2. How unique is the activity? If you’re a professional racecar driver that might catch the eye of the admissions officer more than if you’re a member of the Model UN club. Nothing wrong with being in the Model UN club btw -- esp. If you have leadership (see #1).
3. How “cohesive” are your activities as a whole? This one is harder to judge, but basically do your ECs fit together to form a story versus do they seem random. Imagine if Student A has 10 math ECs versus Student B who is more well-rounded. Depending on what the college is looking for at that moment in time, they might prefer A over B. Again, this one is a lot harder to measure.
I would recommend you list out your ECs and evaluate them using the Tier system in this blog post: https://blog.collegevine.com/breaking-down-the-4-tiers-of-extracurricular-activities/